I saw something similiar on Law and Order, but they said it was too complicated to convict somebody of murder for the killing of an unborn child.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4138582/
Peterson, 31, could face the death penalty if he’s convicted of two counts of murder for the deaths of Laci Peterson and the couple’s unborn son. In April, the remains of mother and child washed ashore along San Francisco Bay, two miles from the spot where Scott Peterson said he was fishing on Christmas Eve 2002, when his wife vanished."
Now, don't get me wrong - I view the act as a double homicide, but how can you murder "a lump of cells" (as one pro-baby killer in the forum put it)?
This strikes me as "it's only murder if you DO NOT wish to murder your own child."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4138582/
Peterson, 31, could face the death penalty if he’s convicted of two counts of murder for the deaths of Laci Peterson and the couple’s unborn son. In April, the remains of mother and child washed ashore along San Francisco Bay, two miles from the spot where Scott Peterson said he was fishing on Christmas Eve 2002, when his wife vanished."
Now, don't get me wrong - I view the act as a double homicide, but how can you murder "a lump of cells" (as one pro-baby killer in the forum put it)?
This strikes me as "it's only murder if you DO NOT wish to murder your own child."